|
Milestones To Date |
|
Tools for Reports |
|
Commission on the University Experience State of the University Address
|
Summit 1 | Summit 2 i| Summit 3 | Summit 4 | Summit 5 Summit 6
Leadership Summits
LEADERSHIP SUMMIT SIX - September 10, 2004
This Summit was conducted to collaborate on two questions related to the Higher Learning Commission visit on Septemeber 20 -22: How does the University meet each criterion and how does the individual unit meet each criterion? Comments from each Summit group are listed in this summary document.
LEADERSHIP SUMMIT FIVE - April 9, 2004
The purpose for this Leadership Summit was to discuss Draft Two of the
CTF comprehensive plan and Draft One of the Transition Plan. Two questions
were given to the groups to guide their discussions - What are your comments
and questions about Draft Two? What are your comments and questions about
the Transition Plan? The comments listed are unedited notes from the small
group discussions to answer the questions. The small group notes are published
here to communicate the information, from the Summit, that will be used
by the Design Team in their upcoming deliberations and decisions to prepare
the final draft to be presented to the campus community on April 30, 2004
and to the Board of Trustees on May 4, 2004.
Comments
from the forum
LEADERSHIP SUMMIT FOUR - MARCH 8, 2004
Summary of Group Discussions
On March 5, 2004 the first draft of the report from the Charting the Future Design Team was presented and distributed to 146 administrators of campus units/programs. Also the draft was published on the Web on March 5. The release of the first draft provided time for campus leadership to read the draft in preparation of the Leadership Summit, held March 8, 2004. The agenda for the Summit provided an opportunity for campus leadership to respond to the first draft plan. Participants were organized into ten groups; each group was assigned a member of the Design Team as a resource person and a group facilitator. The groups were asked to answer three questions, 1) What do you like about the draft plan? 2) What concerns do you have about the draft plan? And 3) What suggestions do you have? This report provides a summary of each group’s discussions and ideas. The statements are unedited and are presented here for information. The Design Team will review the group reports and use the material in their deliberations as they prepare a second draft plan to be submitted for campus comment on April 8, 2004.
LEADERSHIP SUMMIT THREE - FEBRUARY 6, 2004
The agenda for the Leadership Summit included group discussions about the emerging themes from the Unit Reports and campus meetings. The topics or themes discussed included:
• Academic Functions and Structures,
• Professional Development for Faculty, Staff, and Administrators,
• Marketing the University,
• Recruitment and Retention of our Students,
• Technology as a Management and Instruction Tool,
• Teacher Preparation – Our Mission,
• Financial Strategies for Increasing Revenue Sources,
• Strategies to Enhance Operational Efficiencies and Effectiveness,
• General Education
See the results of the summit discussions.
Leadership Summit Two - December 15, 2003
Guiding principles for Charting the Future (CTF) serve as the cornerstone for directing the comprehensive planning process, including the activities, timelines, and campus community involvement. Open communication, value and respect for people, the value of discourse, civility and integrity are elements of the principles that form the foundation for the Leadership Summit held December 15, 2003. The summit, the second of the series was designed to accomplish three objectives: 1) to present information about the Design Team's principles, process and commitments for reviewing and analyzing the reports received from units, and to briefly review the budgeting process for FY 05, 2) to gather information from campus leadership about the process to date, together with suggestions to enhance the process as we move forward; and 3) to provide an opportunity for leaders to share and discuss priority ideas from their units about the future for the University. Comments gathered from the feedback and priority activities were documented to inform the Design Team.
Here are the compilations of comments:
Here are the documents used by Summit participants:
- Flow chart of Charting the Future Process
- Design Team confidentiality agreement
- Design Team operating guidelines
Leadership Summit One - September 19, 2004
The “Charting the Future” planning success is grounded in the knowledge and hopes of its many constituents at UNC; thus it is essential that the campus community have opportunities to provide suggestions, state concerns and issues, and present questions about the activities and process. The Leadership Summit served to initiate this representative process that seeks comments and suggestions from faculty, staff and students. Another goal for the Summit is to empower campus leadership to engage in discourse with their respective constituencies about the draft documents and to encourage campus participation throughout the process.
One hundred fifty leaders serving UNC gathered at a Leadership Summit on September 19, 2003. The Summit was designed to present and discuss two Draft documents considered to be the foundation for developing the “Charting the Future” comprehensive plan.
The Draft documents were the report format and criteria and activities and timelines. Comments and questions were submitted by the Summit participants.
Each small group in the Leadership Summit of September 19 was asked to review the draft of the report format and criteria and the activities and timeline. Facilitators recorded comments and colected questions from index cards on each table. Answers have been provided to the compiled comments and questions.
Answers to the questions on the report format and criteria - October 6
Answers to the questions on the activities and timelines - October 7
Answers to the questions on the Index card additional questions and comments - October 7