Philosophy | University of Northern Colorado
Philosophy | University of Northern Colorado
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Class Forums - Spring 2012
 PHIL 300-003 - Philosophy of Sex
 Pornography as a "Tool"
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author  Topic Next Topic  

Tony Aguirre
Fledgling

12 Posts

Posted - Apr 11 2012 :  6:51:46 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
When I was reading "Pornography as Embodied Practice," the idea of using pornography for something other than a solo mission to "get off," caught my attention. A couple is struggling with their sex life and they take it upon themselves to use porn as a tool to help guide them. Interested in other thoughts....

[Very lightly edited to enhance readability -TT]

Andrew Tafoya
Fledgling

13 Posts

Posted - Apr 12 2012 :  10:25:35 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I have always felt that pornography is more of a bandaid in such a relationship, which more than likely has deeper problems. In a healthy relationship I don't think porn is necessary. I'm sure there are individuals who will say it helps their relationship, but to me it seems to be more of an escape from their partners than a connection to them. It's like saying "we are connected because we both really love to have dinner at different restaurants. If he eats there, and I eat here, it really improves our relationship!" I disagree. If this is the case, you're more interested in the meal than you are in the person who "might like to share a meal."

My perspective on using porn for masturbation is that it is a way for males to enjoy rewards that they haven't earned. It is the participation ribbon for showing up instead of the Olympic gold medal. A man gets the opportunity to see a beautiful women expose herself to him with a lustful and adoring look. He is (entirely in his head) everything she wants and desires, and there is no greater male. To earn this type of trust, respect, adoration, etc., what would a man have to do? He'd have to do more than sit in his mom's basement and play Doom on the computer, I'm guessing. He would have to become the type of man he would like to be through hard work and ambition. When you add up the amount of risk it takes to successfully become the person you wish to be and the amount of time and energy it takes, the task seems daunting. Considering most men are afraid of being exposed in their own minds as people who do not have what it takes to be "heroes," the likelihood is great that they will avoid the risk and take the cheap version of the reward.

[Lightly edited to enhance readability -TT]
Go to Top of Page

Tony Aguirre
Fledgling

12 Posts

Posted - Apr 25 2012 :  6:59:09 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
That was a very interesting reply, but I think that being open to new ideas in the bedroom because of a lack thereof, hardly constitutes such persecution. Perhaps imagination is lacking or unexplored in certain realms. It seems to me that this form of entertainment could bring life to these other experiences a couple might pursue and like...or not like. The metaphor of the dinner is very useful, because this is a context in which people do get asked to try things that are out of their comfort zones. I think this offer could be made the same way.

[Lightly edited to enhance readability -TT]
Go to Top of Page

Alex Artzer
Apprentice

29 Posts

Posted - Apr 27 2012 :  11:25:48 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Andrew, I'm definitely interested in your response. You say, "it's like saying 'we are connected because we both really love to have dinner at different restaurants. If he eats there, and I eat here, it really improves our relationship!'" I guess I think that time apart from your partner, being able to do what you enjoy separately and away from your partner, actually can improve a relationship. Each person in a relationship is on his or her own "journey," and sometimes people make connections by doing things separately and then talking about them later. I read a Psychology Today article about this a couple of months ago, and thought it was very interesting. Having a connection isn't about always being in the same place and always doing things together.

You also say that men use porn for masturbation to “enjoy rewards that they haven’t earned.” Maybe this is just a difference of opinion, but I don’t think pleasure is something a man (or woman) must earn. To go back to that analogy, sometimes it's nice to enjoy dinner with your partner at a restaurant and make it a formal occasion. Sometimes a couple can just relax and have dinner together at home. But sometimes, it’s nice to do your own thing just for the sake of the pleasure it gives you to eat alone. Porn can just be used to aid arousal, can't it? I’m not saying it always is, as problems in relationships have many roots, but sometimes an apple is just an apple.

[Very lightly edited to enhance readability -TT]

Edited by - Alex Artzer on Apr 27 2012 2:20:16 PM
Go to Top of Page

Sergio Cerrillo
Apprentice

28 Posts

Posted - Apr 27 2012 :  1:46:38 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I would have to agree with Alex and Andrew, who by the way had a very interesting way of attacking this question. Sometimes being away from your partner is what is best. You cannot be around them constantly. If you are, they could eventually start working on your nerves and maybe the relationship could end. Pornography can be used for other things than just "getting off"; I think this is true. But is it something you want to have present in your relationship? I definitely don't. I would be embarrassed if my partner knew that I was looking at porn to "spark" something in our relationship.

[Lightly edited to enhance readability -TT]
Go to Top of Page

Andrew Tafoya
Fledgling

13 Posts

Posted - Apr 27 2012 :  2:52:16 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Tony, I think you have a point. However, I think we may be talking about things from slightly different perspectives. My initial assumption was that you were suggesting that porn be a consistent component of the relationship rather than a catalyst for change. I think it's realistic to think that a couple might try introducing porn to get a fresh perspective on their sex life. But I'm not sure I would agree with it's being regularly involved. My thought is still that the need for it suggests that there are underlying problems in the relationship or in one of the individuals.

Alex, I agree that separate time is valuable in a relationship. Engaging in various activities on your own helps you grow as a person and reminds you of why you have chosen to spend your time with the person you're in the relationship with. What I am arguing is that the making use of porn all the time, or needing it to function sexually with your partner, is likely to be more of a detriment than a benefit. In the same way, being away from your partner too often, or needing to be away constantly can be detrimental to a relationship. You might enjoy an occasional meal alone, but not want to eat alone all that much of the time. Unless there are things about the relationship that make spending long periods of time apart inevitable, this would be the sign of an unhealthy relationship.

As for the "reward" you mentioned, I agree one does not need to earn pleasure. What I was speaking of is the reward of respect, adoration, trust, etc... These, among other things, are elements most people would agree are desirable in a healthy relationship. To enjoy these things one must earn them in some form. That is to say the one doing the trusting or adoring must see the relevant qualities in the one he or she trusts or adores. A woman (or man) will not act in the way porn tries to mirror without finding these elements somewhere in the interaction. I'm suggesting that porn is a way for men (or women) to circumvent the work involved in earning those reactions from "real people." Occassional, independent, masturbation facilitated by porn is quite a different thing from what we are discussing now.

[Lightly edited to enhance readability -TT]
Go to Top of Page

Sheldon Vaughn
Fledgling

5 Posts

Posted - May 04 2012 :  1:21:23 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I think that the notion of "earning pleasure" is one that's widely understood—and widely misunderstood as well. It seems to me that many people think that if a date is of a high enough caliber, romantic enough, and expensive enough, then the person who's paid for it should be rewarded, typically with pleasure. This reminds me of the scenario in which a person's vacation trip is paid for with the implicit understanding that this is in exchange for sex.

[Lightly edited to enhance readability -TT]
Go to Top of Page
   Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Philosophy | University of Northern Colorado © 2004 tkt Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.08 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000