| Author |
Topic  |
|
Keith Carlisle
Newcomer
3 Posts |
|
|
Nick Urbaniak
Newcomer
3 Posts |
|
|
Mohamud Mohamed
Fledgling

7 Posts |
|
|
Chris Rice
Newcomer
1 Posts |
Posted - Apr 20 2011 : 2:42:20 PM
|
I would like to take a new direction with this topic, and may be way out there.
I believe that it is sensing someing that turns us on initially. In order to feel desire, we must use one of our senses to to be turned on. This includes seeing a beautiful girl, hearing a beautiful piece of music, feeling an amazing texture, smelling a head-turning perfume, and tasting your favorite food. People who are blind may desire to see, but because this is not possible for them, they depend on their other senses in order to fill that void; hearing, taste, smell and touch. One might counter that we can be turned on by thoughts or memories, but our memories are what we remember sensing at the time, such as standing on top of a mountain, feeling the wind swirling around us, seeing the landscape spread out in front of us and smelling clean, crisp air. One might also counter that if one had no senses, one would still desire to eat just to survive. I'm not sure there's any justification for saying this: without any senses, one could hardly continue to exist unless someone with sense was there to support you, handing you the food that you needed to survive. You'd be entirely incapable of locating food or water on your own.
Sensation is not only what turns us on; it's also the thing that brings about desire. Without our senses life in general would be impossible for us.
[Edited to enhance readability -TT] |
 |
|
|
Devon Seperich
Newcomer
2 Posts |
Posted - Apr 21 2011 : 11:42:39 PM
|
Group 2
Betsy was gone on Wednesday when we went outside to talk, so I jumped in to mediate. Here is how our conversation went:
Chris opened it up with his opinion that sensations are what turn us on. For example the smell of a girl, or the sound of a song you really like. Even color and emotions have the ability to turn us on in some form.
Many in the group agreed with Chris, saying that sensations are the most physical form of desire and are the things that make us conscious of it. We can even be turned on just thinking about a sensation, such as thinking about the touch of soft and bare skin. Cole brought up that it can be a mixture of senses that can turn us on as well. Devin agreed, saying that it is something that we often take for granted, but without any senses at all, we would not desire anything at all.
Then the discussion veered in the direction of handicaps and disabilities. Does a blind or deaf person experience desire in the same way a person with all of his or her senses does? Eileen said that like a voice over the phone or a character in a book, most people, handicapped or not, have the ability to imagine what something can look like, and in the case of a the blind, they do have the ability to experience desire through emotions. She also brought up the fact that other senses often compensate. A blind person often has a heightened sense of hearing and touch for example.
This was right about the time class ended and we ran out of time for further discussion.
[Very lightly edited to enhance readability -TT] |
 |
|
|
Spenser Loos
Fledgling

13 Posts |
Posted - Apr 22 2011 : 09:26:50 AM
|
Group 5
Group 5 continued its discussion on the object of desire and what turns people on. Monica started off the conversation by asking the group to fill her in on what she missed on Monday and the general consensus was that there is a distinction between the object of desire and what turns a person on. To this Monica responded that "We need to figure out what makes a person turned on or is it the need for something?" Scott's reply was "not everything turns us on." I think what Scott was trying to convey to Monica was that there are many things we do not need, therefore there are many things we do not desire. Monica responded by saying that she merely wants to ask, "What has the ability to turn us on and fulfill a need?"
At this point Ty chimed in with this: "I want a million dollars! The money for me is what I want, while the desire I have is to live a life of less stress, and money would make things easier for me." With this, Ty meant to suggest that wants and desires are two separate things.
While I agree that they're separate, I also feel they are related. Ty wants a million dollars! Sure who wouldn't! This want will make possible his desire to be comfortably well off. I think this helps in our discussion by showing that while wants and desires are distinct they still remain somewhat similar.
However Scott added that when wants and needs are different things, and Ty agreed. Monica mentioned that Ty's want of money was rather a need, the need to "feel rich." Ty's response was that "a need is something you can't live without."
Rob at this point entered the conversation, stating that "Desire satisfies a need and that a need is the outlet for desire." This seems substantial in that Rob feels needs are facilitated by a desire and that needs help us to reach a desire. Ty then asked "What is the difference between the desire to be in school as opposed to the need to be in school?" I think what Ty was asking is this: A person may or may not desire to be educated, but it may be that everyone needs to be educated. Is there a difference between these two or are they in fact one and the same?
Zach tried to answer this question be relating saying that "There is a difference between being needing to be in school and needing food!" I believe what Zach was saying was that there is a difference between needs for various things since some things may be necessities. Following this Ty went back to questioning Monica by asking "What is it that you need?" Monica replied by asking Ty what he needed. Ty then gave another example: "Let's say I have a need to beat someone's ass! I have the desire to kick but then and the need to do it is present!" Scott then asked the question that really captivated us all and that was: "Which comes first, desire or need?" At this point we ran out of time, so we couldn't dive head first into this question. but it is one I am sure we will seek to answer in our next discussion!
[Lightly edited to enhance readability -TT] |
 |
|
|
Megan Sargent
Fledgling

17 Posts |
|
|
Kyle Taplin
Fledgling

5 Posts |
|
|
Megan Sargent
Fledgling

17 Posts |
|
|
Kyle Taplin
Fledgling

5 Posts |
Posted - Apr 24 2011 : 1:26:37 PM
|
| Megan: That makes sense. Do you think you really desire coffee then? |
 |
|
|
Scott Crawford
Newcomer
3 Posts |
|
|
Spenser Loos
Fledgling

13 Posts |
|
|
Blake Lucio
Newcomer
3 Posts |
|
|
Nathan Thurlow
Newcomer
4 Posts |
|
|
Spenser Loos
Fledgling

13 Posts |
|
|
Kyle Taplin
Fledgling

5 Posts |
|
|
Keith Carlisle
Newcomer
3 Posts |
|
|
Megan Sargent
Fledgling

17 Posts |
Posted - Apr 25 2011 : 10:23:05 PM
|
Kyle: I do find myself desiring coffee, though this probably has something to do with the physiological need I've acquired for caffeine. That's not quite the same thing as desire.
Scott: I think that we can desire something for a time and then no longer desire it. Sometimes this has to do with our knowledge or ignorance concerning the thing we are desiring. I'll give a personal example. I had extremely strong feelings for someone. We spent a lot of time together and I learned a lot about him. Then one night I learned something about him -- not anything bad, but something that made me realize it would never work. Ever. I had a bit of a cry, and then I was OK. I no longer desired to be with him. I still appreciate him as a friend and always will.
The point is that I think we can lose desires for various reasons. Sometimes we may just have a change in taste or, for lack of a better term, can grow up. Think of something all the things you desired five years ago. Do you still desire them all?
Nathan: Addiction and desire are two very different things in my opinion. I think it's easier to curb desire than to curb an addiction. Desire is more than a physiological "need." It has many more facets to it -- intellectual, emotional, maybe even spiritual. Desiring something and not getting it can lead to some emotional pain. With addiction, especially severe, long-term addiction, there can actually be physical pain and trauma when the thing to which one is addicted is not available. There are narcotic addicts who die from not getting the substance they're addicted to. With nicotine, let's say smoking, there is the physiological addiction, but there is also just the habit of smoking.
[Lightly edited to enhance readability -TT]
|
 |
|
|
Zachary Nash
Newcomer
3 Posts |
|
|
Spenser Loos
Fledgling

13 Posts |
|
Topic  |
|