Independent Review Process
In an Independent Review, the hiring authority receives all applicant files and personally reviews them to narrow the applicant pool to a short list. Those on the short list may be interviewed via telephone or in person by the hiring authority and/or others deemed a part of the hiring decision. The hiring authority is responsible for ensuring compliance with the University’s commitment to diversity.
Pros:
- May take less time than convening a committee and working with their schedules.
- Hiring authority has more control over the process and knows specific qualities required of the job.
Cons:
- Hiring authority must determine if hiring pool is diverse enough.
- Hiring authority does all work associated with hiring process; therefore it can consume a great deal of time personally for the hiring authority.
- Hiring authority’s decision may be perceived as biased.
- The decision may not receive “buy in” from those who work for or with the candidate.
- Because only the hiring authority reviews the initial applicant files, there may be a predisposition to select only a certain types of candidates instead a broader range of applicants who might be better for the position.
- The hiring authority will still have to do much of the interview and associated follow-up work.
Forms Required:
- Administrative/Professional Exempt Position Description Questionnaire PDF/ WORD
- Position Authorization Form (PAF) PDF / WORD
- Screening Criteria WORD
- Position Exemption Request (if requesting exemption from Classified system) PDF / WORD
- Candidate Exit Interview Information PDF / WORD
- Position Finalist Offer Form PDF / WORD
|