Interactive Syllabus
EQUIP Workshop #1
The EQUIP project has focused on several tools to present in workshops over the next year. The first tool is the interactive syllabus. An interactive syllabus is an instruction and organizational tool that can offer intensive information, links and contact information. When used properly, this tool can benefit both instructors and students in several ways. Benefits to instructors include up-front analysis, planning, organization and resource-sharing. Students benefit by having access to course requirements, textbook titles, dates and assignments allowing them to organize and plan ahead for the semester.
When good teaching strategies are employed in the classroom, all students benefit. Good practice techniques, as presented by Chickering and Gamson (1991), are presented here and correlated to the elements of an interactive syllabus:
Good practice encourages student faculty contact: Frequent student-faculty contact in and out of classes is the most important factor in student motivation and involvement. Faculty concern helps students get through rough times and keep on working. Knowing a few faculty members well enhances students' intellectual commitment and encourages them to think about their own values and future plans.An interactive syllabus encourages contact between students and faculty right from the start of the course with concise information, clear expectations and contact information such as a phone numbers and email address. Experienced instructors are aware of the questions that arise during the first couple weeks of classes such as office hours, access to books, missing classes, grading, final exams schedule and class expectations to name a few. Informed students that have all their course "housekeeping" questions addressed prior to the start of classes can be more focused on the course work from the first day of class..
Reciprocity and cooperation comes easily when an instructor is clear about the flexibility and use of the syllabus. Students can suggest links to web resources, current events, campus issues, and instructors can do the same. Collaborative use of the interactive syllabus encourages students to think and share with others (deVry, 2000) in a safe, accepting atmosphere. The focus of the class changes from teaching to learning when an instructor asks for input from students.
Good practice encourages active learning: Learning is not a spectator sport. Students do not learn much just sitting in classes listening to teachers, memorizing pre-packaged assignments and spitting out answers. They must talk about what they are learning, write about it, relate it to past experiences, and apply it to their daily lives. They must make what they learn part of themselves.
Good practice gives prompt feedback: Knowing what you know
and don't know focuses learning. Students need appropriate feedback on performance
to benefit from courses. In getting started, students need help in assessing
existing knowledge and competence. In classes, students need frequent opportunities
to perform and receive suggestions for improvement. At various points during
college, and at the end, students need chances to reflect on what they have
learned, what they still need to know, and how to assess themselves.
An interactive syllabus is a tool that allows for
student-instructor cooperation by expecting feedback about the document where
students are encouraged to share ideas. Asking for feedback supports active
learning (deVry, 2000) and encourages students to
share their information about web sites, literature reviews, documents, books
and other articles that helped. “When
incorporated into online course design, the interactive syllabus can provide a
high level of initial interaction between the learner and the material,
resulting in increasingly progressive engagement with course materials in a
nonlinear and adaptive process” (Richards, 2003).
Offering detailed syllabi access during the registration period
allows students the the opportunity to make an informed choice to select one
course over another. It is cost-effective, it puts ownership into the hands
of the students and allows the instructor more time to teach and interact with
students (Twigg, 1996). The interactive syllabus allows
students to decide immediately whether or not they should take a class.
It answers most of their questions, gives contact information, course
objectives, goals, prerequisites and expectations.
If there are other issues to address, students have the flexibility and
opportunity for prompt feedback. Those issues, whether they have to do with
office hours, access to books, missing classes, grading or anything else can
be put into the syllabi. Informed students that have all their questions addressed
prior to the start of classes will be more focused on the course work because
there will be few unknown topics.
Good practice communicates high expectations:
Expect more and you will get it. High expectations
are important for everyone-- for the poorly prepared, for those unwilling to
exert themselves, and for the bright and well motivated. Expecting students
to perform well becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy when teachers and institutions
hold high expectations of them and make extra efforts.
The instructor’s unique perspective on the course is allowed to
be expressed in the syllabus by objectives, expectations, philosophy and other
individual factors. Instructors with
high expectations offer robust syllabi that cover all areas of concern to
students and respond quickly to any issues.
One basic premise of universal design for learning is that
a curriculum should include alternatives that make the learning accessible and
applicable to students with different backgrounds, learning styles, abilities,
and disabilities. When an instructor varies the way a lesson is taught, more
students benefit. Learning increases when different methods, such as slides,
videos, music, role-playing or small groups are incorporated
into the classroom. Flexibility is essential in the learning process (Rose,
2000) when the design of instruction takes into consideration the many different
types of learning styles, the classroom setting, local events, and personalities
the classroom environment is enhanced and everyone benefits.
References
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson,
Z. F. (1991). Applying
the
Svinicki, M. D. (1999). Teaching and learning on the edge
of the millennium: Building on what we have learned.
http://www.center.rpi.edu/PewSym/mono4.html
Web Sites