Campus Conversations Summaries

October 23rd 12-1 pm Facilitators: Marcus Embry and Robbyn Wacker

Group 1

Strengths:

  • Making difference to students
  • Respect and trust others on campus
    • Safe environment
    • Listened to
  • Ownership participatory values
    • Articulation
    • Reinforcement
    • Accountability
    • Voice
  • Empowering community
    • Voice
    • Rewards, compensation concerns
  • Opportunities for members of community
    • Creates value
    • Opportunity for growth and involvement
  • Working together
    • Communication
    • Student focus
    • Shared mission
    • Shared vision

Seeing the Future:

  • Grow strong programs
  • More/better communication
    • Relation/influence of technology
  • Clear mission and vision goals
  • Safe environment and community
  • Community
    • Better
    • Collaborative
  • Student success
    • Academically
    • Personally
  • Value intellectual diversity
  • Students make more impact
  • Student input on future plans
  • Student focus
  • More alumni connection
  • Improve sense of tradition
  • Pride in and among community
  • Stimulating environment
  • Collaboration instead of competition
  • Emphasize strengths
  • Embrace change

Goals:

  • Resources
    • Internal/external
      • Advocacy
  • Solid leadership
    • Knowledge
    • Durability
    • Accountability
    • Courage/vision
  • Action/results
  • Articulate how to implement mission
  • Productive collaboration/partnership
  • Recruit and retain faculty and staff
    • Resources
    • Compensation
    • Caring
    • Respect and listening
  • Value teachers and staff
  • FUN-being engaged
  • Trust
  • Identity and specificity

Group 2

Strengths:

  • Size of UNC- it allows for possibilities of personal connection
  • Collaboration is important- important to be heard and have action taken- sometimes happened
  • Supportive deans/colleagues; like to build on this and increase network with new faculty
  • Match between jobs description/professional strengths “good fit”- make it work for programmed department
  • Small groups of students who accomplish big tasks idea (eg. Asian students and outreach students are high point; rewarding to see what students can do!
  • Hands on education
  • Personal contact increases
  • “Quality of life” for students and faculty- size we are permits this- quality of learning
  • Quality of “University Community” that exist now is great/outstanding

See the future:

  • University/individual program’s size can be variable across campus and self determined within university; thoughtfully approached
  • A university that has the financial resources that allow “us” to provide the “Quality experience” for students, faculty and staff.
  • Provide rigorous curriculum without losing connection we have between students and faculty
  • Financial support for students
  • Aspects of “student’s life are being addressed (culture issues/needs, student’s color)
  • Delivers it’s programs relative to student need and resources (eg. Having access to computers to take online classes over the internet)
  • Cultural centers that are supported, updated, and active
  • A university that has consensus about what we are good at ad can do (and what we are not good at and cannot do)

Goals:

  • Attention to diverse student’s and diverse academic perspectives
  • International experiences; Global
  • Liberal acts education
  • Honesty articulate our limits (faculty and administrator) as a university; such as our size, quality of education and financial
  • Have faculty who want to stay here – retain quality faculty

Seeing the future:

  • Same size (more or less)
  • Funding growth for international improvement
  • Strong liberal arts care undergrad program
  • International perspective and diversity in community
  • Stronger academic focus
  • Connections to international global world

Strengths:

  • Focus on academics
  • Care for institution
  • Passionate and dedicated faculty-standards/students
  • Institution commitment to students support
  • Willingness to be community- recognize each other and participate
  • Collaboration
  • Size- smaller community, not high profile
  • Tech. and access to info – pedagogical opportunities