Campus Conversations Summaries
October 23rd 12-1 pm Facilitators: Marcus Embry and Robbyn Wacker
Group 1
Strengths:
- Making difference to students
- Respect and trust others on campus
- Safe environment
- Listened to
- Ownership participatory values
- Articulation
- Reinforcement
- Accountability
- Voice
- Empowering community
- Voice
- Rewards, compensation concerns
- Opportunities for members of community
- Creates value
- Opportunity for growth and involvement
- Working together
- Communication
- Student focus
- Shared mission
- Shared vision
Seeing the Future:
- Grow strong programs
- More/better communication
- Relation/influence of technology
- Clear mission and vision goals
- Safe environment and community
- Community
- Better
- Collaborative
- Student success
- Academically
- Personally
- Value intellectual diversity
- Students make more impact
- Student input on future plans
- Student focus
- More alumni connection
- Improve sense of tradition
- Pride in and among community
- Stimulating environment
- Collaboration instead of competition
- Emphasize strengths
- Embrace change
Goals:
- Resources
- Internal/external
- Advocacy
- Internal/external
- Solid leadership
- Knowledge
- Durability
- Accountability
- Courage/vision
- Action/results
- Articulate how to implement mission
- Productive collaboration/partnership
- Recruit and retain faculty and staff
- Resources
- Compensation
- Caring
- Respect and listening
- Value teachers and staff
- FUN-being engaged
- Trust
- Identity and specificity
Group 2
Strengths:
- Size of UNC- it allows for possibilities of personal connection
- Collaboration is important- important to be heard and have action taken- sometimes happened
- Supportive deans/colleagues; like to build on this and increase network with new faculty
- Match between jobs description/professional strengths “good fit”- make it work for programmed department
- Small groups of students who accomplish big tasks idea (eg. Asian students and outreach students are high point; rewarding to see what students can do!
- Hands on education
- Personal contact increases
- “Quality of life” for students and faculty- size we are permits this- quality of learning
- Quality of “University Community” that exist now is great/outstanding
See the future:
- University/individual program’s size can be variable across campus and self determined within university; thoughtfully approached
- A university that has the financial resources that allow “us” to provide the “Quality experience” for students, faculty and staff.
- Provide rigorous curriculum without losing connection we have between students and faculty
- Financial support for students
- Aspects of “student’s life are being addressed (culture issues/needs, student’s color)
- Delivers it’s programs relative to student need and resources (eg. Having access to computers to take online classes over the internet)
- Cultural centers that are supported, updated, and active
- A university that has consensus about what we are good at ad can do (and what we are not good at and cannot do)
Goals:
- Attention to diverse student’s and diverse academic perspectives
- International experiences; Global
- Liberal acts education
- Honesty articulate our limits (faculty and administrator) as a university; such as our size, quality of education and financial
- Have faculty who want to stay here – retain quality faculty
Seeing the future:
- Same size (more or less)
- Funding growth for international improvement
- Strong liberal arts care undergrad program
- International perspective and diversity in community
- Stronger academic focus
- Connections to international global world
Strengths:
- Focus on academics
- Care for institution
- Passionate and dedicated faculty-standards/students
- Institution commitment to students support
- Willingness to be community- recognize each other and participate
- Collaboration
- Size- smaller community, not high profile
- Tech. and access to info – pedagogical opportunities